نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
عنوان مقاله English
نویسندگان English
The structure and narrative, rhetorical and literary methods of the Qur'an are so wide that it can be evaluated from different perspectives. The present article aims to reveal an aspect of the comprehensiveness of the text of the Holy Quran from the perspective of narration and modern storytelling techniques. In recent decades, theorists such as Tim Murphy, Jack Canfield, and Deacon have paid special attention to storytelling techniques. The comprehensiveness of the Qur'an strengthens the hypothesis that the divine word cannot be devoid of the art of drawing a story and its execution, and analyzing the text of the Qur'an with modern narrative theories can reveal neglected areas of this great book that have not been addressed in Qur'anic studies so far. This research, relying on the descriptive-analytical method and meditation on the noble verses and with the aim of discovering and classifying new storytelling techniques, shows that the Holy Qur'an is a method of eloquence, summary, emotional involvement of the audience, feedback and other ways to attract prepared hearts and minds to accept divine guidance until meeting God.
کلیدواژهها English
- قران کریم
منابع انگیسی
1. Canfield, J. and M. Hansen. 1995. Chicken soup for the soul. Deerfield Beach, FL: Health Communications. P: 45
2. Deacon, B & Murphey T. (2001). Deep Impact Storytelling:. English Teaching Forum 39 (4) 10-15, 23.
3. Murphey, T. 1993. Why don‟t teachers learn what learners learn? Taking the guesswork out with action logging. English Teaching Forum, 31, 1, pp. 6–10. ———. 1995.
4. David Carr, Time, Narrative and History Reviewed by.Angel Medina - 1988 - Philosophy in Review 8 (7):250-253.
5. Language Research in Japan. Niigata: International University of Japan. ———. l995b. Action logging. In New ways in teaching writing, ed. R. White. Alexandria, VA: TESOL. ———. 1995c. Meaningful communicative repetition. English Teaching Forum, 33, 4, pp. 37-38. ———. 2000. Shadowing and summarizing (NFLRC Video #11).
6. Honolulu: University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center. ———. (In press-a). Exploring conversational shadowing. Language Teaching Research, 5, 2. ———. (In press-b). Tools of recursion, intermental ZPDs, and critical collaborative autonomy. JALT Journal, 23, 1.
7. Murphey, T. and L. Woo. 1999. Activating metacognition with action logs. The Language Teacher, 23, 5, pp. 15–18.
8. Pavlenko, A. and J. Lantolf. 2000. Second language learning as participation and the (re)construction of selves. In Sociocultural theory and second language learning, ed. J. Lantolf. Oxford: Oxford University Press. "Short story". Merriam-Webster. Retrieved 2012-05-27
9. Stevick, E. W. 1996. Memory, meaning and method. Boston, MA:p:18
10. Heinle and Heinle. 1998. Working with teaching methods: What‟s at stake? Boston, MA: Heinle and Heinle P:22.
